Getting the wrong answer can be a costly mistake. The following issues are dealt with by reference to cases and practical common sense.
- The Importance of the Matter
- The meaning of Dispute
- The effect of Contract procedures
- The effect of previous adjudication decisions
- The Limitation Period
- The Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999
- The Financial Position of the Parties.
2.2. What Should I Do Before an Adjudication?
The right steps taken before the adjudication commences will determine the level of costs and the chances of success and will reduce the time personnel are kept from the main business. The following 8Cs are explained.
- Concluding the Argument
- Choosing the Issue
- Constructing the Logical Argument
- Compiling the Documents
- Crucial Evidence
- Consequence Analysis
- Condensing the Evidence
- Choosing the Adjudicator.
2.3. What if a Party Believes the Adjudicator Lacks Jurisdiction?
An early decision must be made whether or not to challenge the adjudicator's jurisdiction. If challenged both parties will need to consider whether or not to proceed with the adjudication.
The factors that need to be considered, the steps that must be taken and the pitfalls to avoid are reviewed.
2.4. What Should I do During the Adjudication?
The Adjudicator is master of the procedure but must follow the rules of natural justice. The following are examined:
- Submissions
- Response to Submissions
- Unsolicited Submissions
- Without Prejudice Information
- New Evidence and Arguments
- Meetings with the Adjudicator
2.5. What Should I Do When I Receive the Adjudicators Decision?
The minimum essential steps to be taken are described.