Daniel Atkinson Limited Alternative Dispute Resolution
Email:daniel@atkinson-law.com 7 Oakland Drive, Robertsbridge, East Sussex TN32 5EX England
Mobile: 07778 347 777 Tel: +44 (0) 1580 880 532 Fax: +44 (0) 1580 881 140

 

1999 - Changes in Construction

© Daniel Atkinson 01 January 1999


KEYWORDS: The HGRC Act 1996, Engineering Construction Contract forms of contract (ECC), Conditions Precedent to Entitlement, Bremer Handelsgesellschaft MBH v Vanden Avenne Izegem (1978),

The last five years have seen a tremendous change in contractual arrangements, mostly for the good of the construction industry. There are now signs that Employers have absorbed these changes and are taking the industry in a different direction by insisting on very onerous terms particularly in the management of claims. These changes stem from the ideas in the Engineering Construction Contract forms of contract (ECC) and the provisions of the HGRC Act 1996.

The ECC

One of the successes has been the ECC, with its different options and new language. It is now in use on a large number of contracts, particularly in the water processing industry. Although there were initial misunderstandings which caused problems for contractors, the effect of this new form has been to increase contractual awareness of Employers and to require better management from contractors. One area of change has been the need for contractors to make the Employer aware early of problems on site which may affect the cost and completion of the project and to resolve differences quickly as compensation events, term used in the ECC for claims. This willingness of Employers to adopt different contracting arrangements and the perceived benefits of doing so over the last few years has led Employers to re-examine the terms of standard forms.

The HGRC Act 1996

The HGCR Act 1996 has only been effective since 1 May 1998. There are already signs that contractors are adopting the statutory adjudication procedures as a rapid and welcome means of resolving disputes. However the adjudication process places pressures on the Employer since he must reply to the Contractor's submission in a short period, frequently less than one week, whereas the contractor will have taken considerably longer to prepare his submission. The Employer's response to this possibility has been to adopt onerous terms in construction contracts, requiring early notice of claims.

Conditions Precedent to Entitlement

In order for notice to be a condition precedent to entitlement the wording needs to clearly establish that a failure to serve proper notice will result in a loss of rights and the condition must state the precise time within which the notice was to be served Bremer Handelsgesellschaft MBH v Vanden Avenne Izegem (1978).

Many Employers are now drafting conditions precedent which require contractors to give notice of intention to claim within days of the circumstances giving rise to the claim, with a further requirement to provide detailed particulars within a further short period. Indeed the recently published test edition of the FIDIC Red Book reflects this approach of the industry. Clause 20.1 requires the Contractor to give notice no later than 28 days after the event and to submit a fully detailed claim with full supporting particulars within 42 days of the event. Clause 20.1 also states that if the Contractor fails to comply with the Clause then he will not be entitled to an extension of time nor to additional payment.

Some Employers have gone further and require Contractors, as a condition precedent to entitlement, to make their claims for additional payment in each monthly application for payment. Each application is required to provide full details of the claim. It is clear that Employers are adopting this approach to prevent any surprises in statutory adjudication. By requiring Contractors to submit fully particularised claims shortly after the event, Employers are then in a position to prepare their response and record necessary facts. Indeed many Employers require the Contractor to keep contemporaneous records which as necessary to substantiate the claim, and make this requirement also a condition precedent to entitlement.

One further development is the requirement for the Contractor to agree the value of the claim with payment on the Contractor's monthly application, or to provide the Employer with detailed reasons why not. This is a development of the concepts in the ECC forms of contract requiring claims to be dealt with under strict timescales.

It is clear that in the next few years contractors will need to be careful to adopt good commercial management in relation to claims. They will need to provide Employers with detailed information as events arise in order to avoid losing their rights.